Facebook Pixel
logo

800-perkins

203-397-1283

Get to know the power of Perkins!

Important Limitations of a Revocable Living Trust

A revocable living trust can make estate planning much smoother, but it comes with its limitations. While such a trust can have a huge impact on minimizing probate involvement when you pass away, it comes with limitations many are unaware of when going into their estate planning.

Here are some of the top myths regarding revocable living trusts that many people seem to believe.

Probate Can Be Fully Avoided with a Living Trust

This is the most commonly believed myth and can be the most damaging. Probate court procedures are, unfortunately, not fully avoidable. However, they can be significantly minimized with a proper living trust. In Connecticut, keeping your assets out of probate will lead to much less paperwork being filed, including the estate tax return, but there will still have to be some probate court involvement.

Estate Tax Can Be Avoided with a Living Trust

A living trust can certainly be made to include provisions that will address estate tax planning, but the same can be accomplished with a well thought out last will and testament. In Connecticut, the current estate tax exemption is $2 million.

Probate Court Fees Can be Avoided

It makes sense to think if you sort out your own affairs, the court won’t have fees. Unfortunately, this is not the case. Even if none of your assets go through probate, there will still be a charge based on the size of your estate. This includes all non-probate assets. While it is called a court fee, it operates much more similarly to a tax, which is how the probate court system is funded.

My Assets Will Be Protected if I End Up in a Nursing Home

Unfortunately, assets in a typical living trust are not protected from a nursing home or even other creditors. If this is the goal for your living trust, there are other types of trusts that could be used instead that better address your specific needs.

If you are considering a living trust but aren’t sure where to start, we can help. Our Elder Law attorneys at Jonathan Perkins Personal Injury Lawyers can help from start to finish, and educate you on the best estate planning and trusts for your individual needs. Contact us today for a free consultation.


Common Medical Errors Made by Doctors and Hospitals

Sometimes unhappiness with a course of treatment for your ailments can be due to more than just a difference in style and bedside manner. When a medical error leads to the worsening of your condition, or an entirely new malady, you may be entitled to compensation. Knowing the common medical errors that are awarded compensation can help a victim decide whether it’s time to pursue legal action.

Misdiagnosis and Delayed Diagnosis

Many medical malpractice complaints stem from misdiagnosis or a delayed diagnosis that led to bigger problems. For a successful malpractice case, it must be proven a reasonably skilled doctor who was acting competently would not have made the same diagnosis error.

Childbirth Injuries

There are many fetal injuries that are considered childbirth injuries. These can happen either before or after birth. Generally, childbirth injuries are classified under two categories.

  • Negligence in prenatal care. Negligence can affect a child at any point in a pregnancy. This includes:
    • not identifying birth defects
    • delayed or not diagnosing a disease that could be transmitted to the fetus
    • not identifying an ectopic pregnancy
    • failing to diagnosis a medical condition that affects the mother such as anemia or gestational diabetes
  • Negligent childbirth care. When a doctor’s negligence during childbirth leads to injury, it can have devastating effects. Common errors include:
    • failure to anticipate issues due to a baby’s large size or a tangle umbilical cord
    • not responding to fetal distress
    • not ordering a necessary cesarean section
    • improper or incompetent use of forceps

Medication Errors

When a patient receives too much or too little of a medication when a reasonable physician would not have made the error, there could be serious harm. Examples of medication errors include:

  • Incorrect dosage written on prescription
  • A correct prescription being improperly filled by a nurse
  • Equipment malfunction causing improper administration of drug
  • In a hospital, receiving another patient’s medication

Anesthesia Errors

Anesthesia errors can be among the most dangerous of medical errors. Examples of this type of mistake include:

  • Not properly reviewing patient history
  • Not properly informing patient of the risks
  • Giving too much anesthesia
  • Not monitoring vital signs
  • Improper intubating
  • Defective equipment

If you feel your physician did not use proper care, contact one of our Connecticut medical malpractice lawyers at Jonathan Perkins Injury Lawyers. We will review your case and help you take the first steps toward compensation for your pain and suffering.


Is it Food Poisoning or the Flu?

Connecticut Food Poisoning Lawyer There are few things to compare to the misery of being sick to your stomach.  Our digestive systems are tremendously sensitive to things that don’t belong in them, and will strenuously reject both viruses and bacteria.  A stomach virus is a contagious illness that can be spread from person to person, while other digestive system illnesses can be caused by bacteria or parasites that are generally transmitted through the food that we eat. Though the only things that can be done to protect yourself against a stomach virus are to practice good hygiene around an infected person and to carefully wash hands and all surfaces or objects where viruses may remain after having been touched by a contagious person, the same is not true of food poisoning. Food poisoning only happens when harmful organisms are transferred into food, whether before or during the time they first enter the market, the way that they are stored or handled on the way to market, or during the course of preparation. If you are feeling ill, it is important that you understand whether you are suffering from food poisoning or the flu. This is not only essential for making sure that you get the appropriate medical treatment, but also so that you know what legal options may be available to you.

The symptoms of a stomach virus generally include diarrhea, nausea and vomiting, loss of appetite and stomach cramps. Many people will also experience headaches, body aches, low-grade fever and dizziness. The symptoms generally appear over a gradual period of time, and often in an environment where other people are also ill. By contrast, food poisoning appears within six hours of eating. Though it is not something that is shared by people in the same environment, it can be shared by people who have eaten food from the same source, whether that is food purchased at a market or prepared by a restaurant (or even in your own kitchen).

Food poisoning can be minor and can clear up very quickly, often in a matter of a few hours to a few days. It can also take a much more serious turn, requiring hospitalization. It may even lead to serious physical injuries. In any given year, of the 48 million Americans who suffer from food poisoning approximately 128,000 will require hospitalization and 3,000 will die. Food poisoning is particularly dangerous for people who have weak immune systems, as well as for infants, children and the elderly.

People who have been impacted by serious and harmful food poisoning do have the right to sue those who are responsible. This may be a restaurant, a retailer or a wholesaler that sells contaminated food products. A personal injury lawsuit would seek compensation for damages suffered, including medical costs, lost wages, and other expenses incurred.

If you have suffered these types of damages as a result of food poisoning, the attorneys at Jonathan Perkins Injury Lawyers can provide you with all of the information you need about your rights and the compensation to which you may be entitled. Call us today to set up a free consultation.


Active Ingredient in Actos Still Being Linked to Bladder Cancer

 Actos is a medication that is prescribed to regulate blood sugar levels in those who have been diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes. Though the drug has been on the market for almost twenty years, its use is extremely controversial because its long term use has been linked to a number of serious health complications. Among these is an increased risk of bladder cancer. This has led to numerous personal injury Actos lawsuits being filed against the company’s manufacturer, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, and to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requiring that the drug’s label include a warning about the risk. Though Takeda has argued that their medication is safe, pointing to some studies that indicate that there is no causal link between the drug’s active ingredient and bladder cancer, more recent studies have continued to suggest a link.

The active ingredient in Actos is pioglitazone. Since concerns have been raised about the link between pioglitazone and bladder cancer, the FDA has asked Takeda to perform a 10-year study of their drug. In addition to reviewing interim results of this study, the agency has also reviewed other studies that have been done since the Actos lawsuits began to be filed, and these results have continued to point to a link. One study published in the BMJ in early 2016 reported a 63% higher risk for bladder cancer following patients being treated with pioglitazone. That study indicated that the longer the medication was taken and the higher the dose, the greater the risk. Another study published in The New England Journal of Medicine identified an additional source of concern. Patients taking the medication were shown to gain more weight, experience water retention and swelling, and be at higher risk for serious bone fractures leading to surgery or requiring hospitalization.

As a result of these negative studies and in spite of some other research drawn from a 10-year study drawn from the database of Kaiser Permanente of Northern California, the FDA has indicated that they continue to believe that there may be a link between pioglitazone and an increased risk for bladder cancer, and that they plan to order that the medication’s labeling add the newer study results to its list of warnings.

Prior to the FDA’s intervention, Takeda Pharmaceutical’s own preclinical trials had already shown that in animal studies there was evidence of a link between the medication and bladder tumors. There have been thousands of Actos lawsuits filed against the drug manufacturer, as well as against its partner Eli Lilly, seeking compensation for the damages suffered by those who were prescribed the drug and who were later diagnosed with bladder cancer. Individuals have been awarded millions of dollars in jury trials and in April 2015 the company settled thousands of bladder cancer claims for over $2 billion dollars. If you have been harmed by Actos, the attorneys at Jonathan Perkins Injury Lawyers can help. Contact us today to set up a free consultation.


What are the Differences Between a Manufactured Defective Product and a Designed Defective Product?

 Products that cause injuries to consumers are frequently the subject of legal claims for compensation. These claims are known as defective product or product liability lawsuits, and they are based on the notion that a manufacturer, designer, and supplier of a product has a legal obligation to exercise a duty of care to those who are purchasing their goods. In proving a defective products case, the plaintiff – or person who suffered the harm and who is filing the lawsuit – has to prove a few different things. They have to prove that the product was defective; they have to prove that they suffered some kind of damages or injury; and they need to prove that the product was the proximate cause of their injury. Adding to the complexity of the items that need to be proven, there are a few different generally accepted types or causes of defective products that the justice system has identified. Among these are defects in the manufacturing process, defects in the design of the product, and defects in the warning or instructional information that was provided to the consumer with the product. Though the last of these is relatively easy to understand, the difference between a manufactured defective product and a designed defective product can be more opaque. We’ll try to explain the difference.

When a product is determined to have a manufacturing defect, it means that something went wrong while the item was being fabricated. Perhaps the materials that were used were carcinogenic, or perhaps a screw was not sufficiently tightened and that caused the parts to come loose. Examples of manufacturing product defects would include medical devices designed to be implanted in the body that wear down or break, or food that sickens people as a result of contamination with bacteria during the manufacturing process.

By contrast, a product whose design is deemed defective is inherently dangerous before it ever reaches the manufacturing stage. One of the most famous examples of this is that of the Ford Pinto, a vehicle whose fuel system was designed in such a way that it would explode when the vehicle was involved in a rear-end collision.  What made the Ford case particularly egregious was the fact that the auto manufacturer was aware of the vehicle’s dangers but elected to sell the vehicle anyway. They made a cost-benefit decision weighing the value of having to pay a few lawsuits versus making a change to the automobile’s design. The jury’s original award in one of the many defective product cases filed against it was the largest against an automaker at that time.

As a consumer, you have no need to identify at what point a product’s life cycle negligence took place. All you need to do is focus on your own health and put the legal aspects into the hands of a qualified, experienced personal injury attorney. If you or someone you love has suffered an injury as a result of a defective product, call the attorneys at Jonathan Perkins Injury Lawyers today to learn more about how we can help.


How Does Mandatory Arbitration Limit Your Ability to Sue Nursing Homes?

 Nobody wants to get involved in a lawsuit. This is partially because – obviously – nobody wants to suffer an injury that is worthy of filing a claim, and partially because the process can be stressful. Still, there is a certain level of comfort that we each have in knowing that if the worst happens, we have the American justice system available to help us right wrongs. Unfortunately, that sense of security may end up being ripped out from under people who have loved ones residing in nursing homes.

At issue is an ongoing case regarding a common practice of nursing homes – requiring that residents sign off on admissions contracts requiring that they waive their rights to pursue legal action against them in cases of nursing home injuries or abuse and instead resolve disputes and claims in arbitration proceedings.  This language is often hidden deep within the fine print of the contracts that are presented to infirm or elderly residents or their family members at a point when they are feeling most vulnerable, and even desperate, to find appropriate living arrangements or care.  It has served to benefit the nursing homes themselves, who have used it to avoid having to pay sizeable damages that juries have assessed against them when injuries resulting from nursing home abuse or neglect have taken place.

Legislators were behind the original objection to the arbitration requirements, and sought to cut off funding to any nursing homes that received government funding who required that these arbitration contracts be signed. But the nursing home industry has fought hard to knock down the rule that was introduced by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and since then the rule has been the subject of a great deal of legal maneuvering. The agency has put a hold on enforcement of the rule as a result of an injunction that has been placed against it, and has indicated that it will hold off until that injunction is lifted by the courts.  The injunction was granted by the U.S District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi following a request submitted by the American Health Care Association, a lobbying group representing the nursing home industry.

The legal machinations go far beyond being a simple argument. For those who have elderly or infirm loved ones who are living in nursing homes or long-term care facilities, the notion of being forced to agree to arbitration before being allowed entry to a care facility is a true Catch-22: they are being put in a position of either finding another facility, or giving up their rights to sue a facility, even if they have unquestionably caused real harm to their loved one.

The final chapter on this issue has not yet been written, and at Jonathan Perkins Injury Lawyers we will continue to provide our clients with compassionate legal advocacy on behalf of their loved ones who have suffered injuries as a result of nursing home negligence. If you need help, contact our office and set up a free consultation.


Only Six Percent of Cases Filed Are Tort Related

 If you were to take a guess about what goes on inside of America’s civil court rooms, what percentage of cases heard would you guess are medical practice, slip and fall accidents, product liability cases and the like. Sixty percent? Seventy-five percent? More?

If your guess was anywhere above ten percent, you’re way off. In fact, only six percent of cases that are filed are tort related.

Why were you under such a wrong impression? Because that’s what big businesses want you to believe. The more they spread the myth of frivolous lawsuits and unreasonable damages being paid to dubious victims, the more they can blame rising prices on the same.

Think about the cases that you’ve heard about – the ones that have been pointed to as being wastes of court time and business money. The one you probably know best is the McDonalds’ hot coffee case. Remember that one? You probably think that the victim in that case filed a silly lawsuit based on non-existent or inconsequential damages and that they got millions of dollars. In fact, the woman who filed the suit was elderly and was hospitalized for over a week as a result of the third-degree burns that she suffered. The coffee that was served to her was not just hot, but was in fact fifty degrees hotter than the temperature that is generally served at retail establishments and they had received hundreds of complaints about the issue, and perhaps most importantly the woman had asked for just $20,000 to cover her medical bills. Her actual jury award was just $640,000. Yet McDonalds and other businesses have subtly promoted the notion that this was yet another example of unreasonable litigation.

There are many other, similar cases that are frequently evoked by legislators and corporations seeking tort reform.

Yet the truth is that when you look at the actual numbers, only 1.3 percent of all civil cases are personal injury lawsuits, and there was a dramatic decrease of 52 percent in the number of personal injury jury trials in the years between 1992 and 2005. More importantly, in the years between 1985 and 1991, almost half of all federal litigation was between businesses fighting over contracts, and when it comes to frivolous lawsuits, judges are quick to point out that they are seeing decreasing numbers of claims filed, and that they have the power to dismiss cases that they feel are without merit – and to penalize attorneys who bring them.

One of the most important points to remember when it comes to personal injury lawsuits, attorneys generally do not get paid unless they win their clients’ case – and then they just receive a percentage of the damages awarded. These attorneys do not take cases unless they are fairly certain that they are valid, as they do not get paid when their clients don’t win.

If you have suffered an injury as a result of negligence, a personal injury attorney from Jonathan Perkins Injury Lawyers will provide you with a fair assessment of your rights and the strength of your case. Contact us today to set up a free appointment with one of our experienced professionals.


What Does a Truck Driver Learn in CDL School?

If you’re like most drivers, at one time or another you have seen a tractor trailer or other large commercial truck exhibit some kind of maneuver whose riskiness took your breath away – or maybe you’ve seen something worse, and actually witnessed a truck accident. Some people believe that truck drivers are extremely knowledgeable and have gone through extensive training in order to be able to get behind the wheel of an enormous truck, while others doubt that truck drivers have completed enough training, and worry that they represent a constant danger. The truth is that the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration has established national training standards for new truck and bus drivers that are specifically designed to ensure that those holding commercial drivers’ licenses are held to a higher standard.  Unfortunately, this does not mean that all drivers behave according to their training. The truck accident attorneys at Jonathan Perkins Injury Lawyers are ready to help if you or someone you love has been injured as a result of negligence caused by a truck driver, the trucking company, or anybody else that may have contributed to the accident taking place.

People who have witnessed erratic or irresponsible truck driver behavior may ask themselves what a truck driver learns in CDL school. Getting a Commercial Drivers’ License has different requirements depending upon what state the license is issued by, but the truth is that there is no requirement that a truck driver actually attend CDL school. These schools exist to provide prospective truck drivers with readiness training that will help them pass the tests established by the federal and state. So while the CDL training school may provide hands-on training with instructors, practice equipment and facilities, and classroom preparation for taking the license exam, none of this is actually necessary.

When a person decides that they want to become a truck driver they simply need to obtain a Commercial Driver’s License. To do that they need to get a copy of their state’s Commercial Driver’s License Manual, decide what type of vehicle and what kind of driving they want a license for, get their Commercial Learners Permit, which authorizes them to practice on public roads with a qualified Commercial Driver’s License holder next to them, and then after 14 days, take the Skills Test. In order to get the permit the driver must pass the knowledge test for the type of driving they want to do and have their driving record checked for the last ten years in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. They also need proof that they are medically qualified, usually provided through a DOT medical card.

After all of these materials are provided and the knowledge and skills test have been passed, it’s a matter of processing the paperwork, with some states providing the license on the very same day.

CDL school provides far more hands on experience and preparation then is required by law, but is still no guarantee that a driver will behave responsibly once they are behind the wheel. The high number of fatalities and injuries that result from truck accidents point to the need for commercial truck drivers to hold themselves to a higher standard. When they fail in this obligation and someone you love is injured, the truck accident lawyers at Jonathan Perkins Injury Lawyers can help.


Safety Tips for Driving When Daylight Savings Time Ends

Daylight savings time was introduced in the United States in 1918. It began much earlier in other countries. The goal of the time shift was to provide additional daylight to allow workers to both begin and complete their work routines and still have an hour of daylight after the work day is over.  Though the shift was effective, when the days get shorter during the winter the practice meant that people were waking up and headed to work when it was still dark out, and that was impractical. As a result, the practice of shifting the clock backwards an hour in the weeks before winter started was introduced and continues today. As a result, starting this weekend sunset arrives one hour earlier, thus meaning that when people are driving home from work, they do so in the dark. Skilled and experienced drivers can navigate neighborhood roadways but they need to pay close attention to ensure. The law firm of Jonathan Perkins Injury Lawyers is dedicated to protecting the safety of drivers and pedestrians alike. Here are important safety tips for driving when daylight savings time ends.

Driving home from work or to evening activities during the summer hours means you have the benefit of clear visibility and plenty of light, but once we turn the clocks back, we are driving in the dark at the same time that kids may be heading home from sports or play. Commuters who cycle to work are harder to see on the way home, and the coming of darkness can even make it easier to get drowsy behind the wheel. To avoid getting into an accident or causing harm, review these safety tips and make sure that you’re keeping them in mind whenever you’re behind the wheel:

  • Always drive the speed limit, and if you are driving in a neighborhood do not attempt to go around vehicles that are stopped. The vehicle may be dropping children off from after school activities or sports.
  • Avoid all distractions while behind the wheel, and particularly the use of a cell phone. You should never text, check email or even program a GPS while your vehicle is in motion.
  • Make sure that you are driving in a way that makes it easy for other drivers to predict what you are going to do. Use your turn signals when turning and use your hazards if you are stopping.
  • Be cautious when backing up.

Obeying the rules of the road is always important, but when visibility is reduced and school is in session it is particularly important. Take your time when driving at night and obey these safety rules to avoid an accident that can change somebody’s life, and if you or someone you love are injured by a driver who is not paying attention to safety rules and is operating their vehicle carelessly, contact the attorneys at Jonathan Perkins Injury Lawyers to learn about your rights and the compensation you may be entitled to.


Misuse of Fireworks in Connecticut

As summer approaches, we all anticipate all of its pleasures. Days at the beach, backyard barbecues, and especially fireworks set off to celebrate Memorial Day, the Fourth of July, Labor Day, and the season itself. As dazzling and inspiring as these pyrotechnic shows can be, they also present a risk of danger and injury when the proper level of care is not used in their manufacture or by the people who are igniting them. There have been far too many incidents in which fireworks shows have gone awry and shells have either exploded early or been mishandled and ended up firing into spectators, or even setting nearby homes on fire. Over 9,000 fireworks injuries are estimated to take place every year, and about four result in fatalities. If you or someone you love has been injured or suffered damages as a result of the misuse of fireworks, you may be eligible to receive compensation from those responsible. The professionals at Jonathan Perkins Injury Lawyers are here to provide you with valuable information about your rights and the best actions for you to pursue.

There are a number of instances of fireworks having been manufactured with defects: fuses that are defective may result in the product exploding early, or appearing to fail and inviting users to come near and then suddenly exploding. In most cases fireworks injuries are caused by the actions of those who are setting them off. Whether the person responsible is a neighbor setting them off in their backyard or a professional fireworks display company, fireworks need to be handled with maximum care, and when they are improperly used the injuries can be severe. Spectators can suffer burns, lacerations from shrapnel and debris, injury to their eyes, and even death. In order to minimize the risk of injury, those who are using fireworks should take great care to handle them according to the manufacturer’s directions and keep children far away from the ignition site. Special care needs to be taken to ensure that homes, people, and flammable items are far away, and it is important to keep a fire extinguisher close at hand in case of emergencies.

If you were injured as a result of the misuse of fireworks at a fireworks show, you may be eligible to recover damages from those who were responsible for the incident. Liability is often linked to negligence, but personal injury lawsuits for these injuries can be leveled not only at the company or individual responsible for igniting the explosive, but also at the entity responsible for organizing the show. An experienced personal injury attorney will work to prove that the organizer failed in their responsibility to properly supervise the event, or in their duty to ensure that spectators would be kept safe. Jonathan Perkins Injury Lawyers have the experience and passion for justice that you need to get you the compensation that you deserve for the damages that you have suffered. Call us today to set up an appointment to discuss your case.

DON’T TAKE IT FROM US, TAKE IT FROM OUR CLIENTS

  • “You guys were the best thank you again”

    - Bonnie Channey

  • “Thank you so much all the staff at Jonathan Perkins Injury Lawyers. I personally want to say thank you to my case manager Carmen Baldwin, she is very thorough and...”

    - Katherine Vadnais

  • “This is the third Attorneys office I have gone to. They were the ONLY through group... My Attorney stood up for me in court and I was Happy that I...”

    - Candi Edwards

  • “I was with another lawyer and he was not getting the job done. No doctors for me to see. When I changed over to Perkins, I had a doctor within...”

    - Jan Vasquez

  • “Their hospitality is amazing from start to finish. I will always contact them when i need a service that they provide. This is my second time calling them in a...”

    - Crystal Moore

  • “Made a negative experience {auto accident} positive. Result was much better than I expected. No problems or hassle with insurance and always kept informed.”

    - Patrick M Taylor

  • “Beautiful new office located in downtown Waterbury. Call for information on free off street parking. If your injured, Get the Power of Perkins.”

    - Kevin Banahan

  • “One word.....RESULTS! I was in a very bad auto accident on the Merritt Pky April 3, 2016 (CT) that nearly took my life and sustained major painful injuries and had...”

    - Eve M.

  • “They made everything so easy! I never felt out of the loop and they always kept me informed as to how my case was moving along. Very pleased with their...”

    - Chy Archer

  • “Smartest and friendliest! They will fight for you!”

    - Nicole Ilana

  • “They are so helpful and always called me right back. They were very effective!”

    - Pamela Smith

  • “Was involved in a car accident 3 years ago. From start to finish Jonathan Perkins and firm were always there for us throughout the entire process. From check in calls...”

    - Gabriel

  • “Get the Power of Perkins when your injured.”

    - Kevin Banahan

  • “Great lawyers they did their job better that anyone soo recomended”

    - Nancy Arana

  • “Carmen always kept me posted on my case evwry two weeks she was an awesome case worker”

    - Tammy S.

  • “Very professional people... Always available for you if you have any questions; which was never for me because the office is very good with keeping you informed on what's going...”

    - Shemeka Council

  • “I cant say enough about this firm! Professional, organized and just an overall great experience! The entire team was very knowledgeable not only about the law and state requirements but...”

    - Tamara Rivera

  • “U did an awsome job i was able to buy my first home and im very happy”

    - Deborah

  • “I retained Johnathan Perkins Injury Lawyers to represent me on a Social Security Disability Claim; and, their team worked very diligently on my case. During the evaluation period there was...”

    - Marybeth Clifford

  • “I had a beautiful experience with Jonathan Perkins Law firm. Carmen was a very nice and efficient paralegal. She kept me in the loop and always showed concern with my...”

    - Les T.

  • “Friendly people. Was going through a hard time, but they continued working for what I needed no matter what.”

    - Christina Amon

  • “It was a wonderful experience being a client. The staff was friendly and informative. Definitely would recommend Jonathan Perkins to my friends.”

    - Inger Kierce

  • “I was extremely satisfied with Jonathan Perkins Injury Lawyers. My overall experience was excellent. I recommend them.”

    - Mark G.

  • “Jonathan Perkins Injury Lawyers did a good job and I am very satisfied. The service was excellent and if the need arose I would hire them again.”

    - Luis N

  • “I want to congratulate Attorney Perkins for having a wonderful team working for his clients. Kevin Blake did a wonderful job with my workers’ compensation case. Shawn, my case manager,...”

    - Arthur Z

  • “Vivian was awesome. We have never been through this process before and she made it easy. Thank you.”

    - Elizabeth

  • “Thank you so much for advocating and fighting for my husband. Through all of your diligence, he was able to get justice. We are very grateful. God bless!”

    - S. Howard

  • “Excellent law firm. Morgan Alicea, my case manager, was truly excellent and very precise. So happy I listened to your advertisements and sought your help”

    - Helen

  • “Thank you Jonathan for coming in person to our home to meet us back in July 2014. It was appreciated and good to get to know you.”

    - Coralie

  • “Thank You!! Best decision I ever made! Was considering calling someone else but I’m so happy with your staff. I feel secure in knowing that my case is in good...”

    - Calvin

  • “I would like to thank the whole staff for being very concerned about my well-being. Thank you sincerely from the heart!”

    - Beverly

  • “My father was killed when his car was hit by a tractor trailer truck that was traveling too fast. We first retained a law firm that didn’t seem to be...”

    - Nelda

  • “I enjoyed being a customer of Jonathan Perkins Injury Lawyers. I was updated every two weeks about my case and I found it extremely helpful to know what was going...”

    - Cora

  • “Both my sons were in a car accident. Of all the people that we talked to, we found that Jonathan was best for us”

    - Carl

  • “I slipped and fell in a store, crushing my left shoulder. I felt as though no one was listening until I called Jonathan Perkins”

    - Barbara

  • “My doctor made me believe that I was in better shape than I really was. This led to complications during the birth of my daughter. With Attorney Jonathan Perkins, I...”

    - Erika

  • “I fell down in a business premises and a metal plate landed on me, injuring me. I know that my case is being handled efficiently because I have an investigator,...”

    - Jeffre

  • “I enjoyed working with my case manager and my attorney. They went above and beyond — I can’t say enough about them. I would refer them to anybody, in fact...”

    - Charles

  • “The staff is caring and concerned and my experience with Jonathan Perkins Injury Lawyers has been pleasant”

    - Joan R

  • “Jonathan Perkins Injury Lawyers is very professional, courteous and personable, and they go the extra mile to assist their clients. When I walked in the door I spoke to a...”

    - Jackie

  • “Initially I called another firm and I was told that I didn’t have a case. I am very thankful that Jonathan Perkins Injury lawyers took my case and settled it....”

    - Paulette

  • “I enjoyed being a customer of Jonathan Perkins Injury Lawyers. I was updated every two weeks about my case and I found it extremely helpful to know what was going...”

    - Cora

  • “Excellent service and I will be in contact with you for future services”

    - Freddy Ramirez

  • “In the past I’ve had some pretty negative dealings with lawyers which had left me feeling that lawyers were all unscrupulous, taking advantage of their client’s stressful state. Jonathan Perkins...”

    - Rosina

  • “I like the way my case has been handled. They took care of my needs and questions. Thank you”

    - Georgianna Heslop

  • “Thank you all for helping me with my case.”

    - Madalyn Bernhardt

  • “Great representation. Good communication and detailed information about the case. Professional and knowledgeable representation”

    - Estephanie

  • “Very attentive to your case, works out every little detail, will not blow you off or ignore you, I was using a different lawyer prior, but switched and am SO...”

    - Amanda Bernardo

  • “I just want to say thank you for the help and direction that Atty Kevin Blake and cast worker Renita Lathrop. I have never been so pleased with the work...”

    - Amie Aquino

  • “Rent is was my paralegal and she really made my situation less of a stress factor in my life! The office was so helpful with explaining everything in away I...”

    - Ricardo Montanez

  • “My mother hurt her back at work and Jonathan Perkins helped keep her on her feet! Especially Renita who went the extra mile to make sure my mom had everything...”

    - Jasmine Riveria

  • “It was a Pleasure working with Our Case worker Renita. Very helpful and responsible!”

    - Ruth Noemi Rivera

  • “We were very happy with the care that was taken of a workman's comp case for my husband. W knew from the start that we did not have the knowledge...”

    - Maureen

  • “It has been my pleasure working with Shawn von brieson and attorney mcarthy, Shawn has always been extremely attentive to any and all of my phone calls e-mails etc. and...”

    - Bruce Vaughan

  • “Great law firm! They have been amazing. Shawn Von Briesen is personally one of the best case managers ever! This guy has definitely helped me out as well for the...”

    - Chris Rodriguez